 The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” is being sold as a fiscally responsible course correction. But peel back the talking points, and it becomes clear: this isn’t about budgets. It’s about priorities.
If enacted, the bill would slash core programs--Medicaid, SNAP, housing assistance, and public health infrastructure—disproportionately affecting low-income, rural, elderly, and disabled Americans. Meanwhile, the top 10% of earners stand to gain thousands annually in tax breaks. It’s not reform. It’s a regressive transfer of wealth, taking from those with the least and rewarding those with the most. The deeper danger? Not just economic fallout, but political fatigue. These cuts don’t hit all at once. They arrive quietly—through delayed care, rising homelessness, closed rural hospitals, and overburdened schools. And when the pain surfaces, blame is often redirected. This moment mirrors past collapses—when middle classes eroded, hope vanished, and revolutions didn’t begin with rage, but with resignation. 📘 In my full-length Substack essay, I unpack the bill’s mechanics, trace its historical parallels to the fall of the Whigs and the Roman Republic, and lay out what citizens can still do to stop the damage. 👉 Read the full essay here
0 Comments
When Chaos Becomes the Norm: Why I Wrote a White Paper on Executive Drift and Governance Breakdown6/10/2025 I didn’t set out to write a white paper. I set out to understand why I felt so damn uneasy. Maybe it started with seeing peaceful protestors met by armored vehicles. Maybe it was the endless chaos in Washington. Or maybe it was just me—an immigrant, veteran, and parent—wondering how much longer our institutions could bend before they break.
What began as frustration turned into research. What became research turned into structure. What emerged is now something I hope contributes meaningfully to the public record: a documented, reasoned critique of how executive power has drifted from constitutional constraint toward normalized chaos. 📄 Read the full white paper here! “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” — Mark Twain As a Navy veteran, lifelong student of history, and someone who’s spent decades navigating complex systems in the business world, I’ve always believed that pattern recognition is one of the most underrated skills we can cultivate. That’s why I wrote this new white paper: History Rhymes: What the Fall of the Roman Republic Tells Us About American Polarization. It’s not alarmist, and it’s not a screed. It’s a sober, sourced, and accessible comparison between the late stages of the Roman Republic and the growing dysfunction in today’s American democracy. Rome didn’t fall in a single coup—it frayed over decades. Economic disparity, elite corruption, political violence, and populist spectacle slowly unraveled a system that had lasted five centuries. I explore how:
This paper isn’t a history lesson for the sake of nostalgia. It’s a roadmap and a warning. 📄 Read the full essay on my Substack here: History Rhymes: What the Fall of the Roman Republic Tells Us About American Polarization 📝 For context, I’ve also previously written about Trump and Charles X—a Bourbon king whose stubbornness paved the way for a different kind of revolution. Sometimes, history is a mirror. Other times, it’s a caution sign. Let’s not ignore either. As a Navy veteran who has served on multiple warships, I can tell you that names matter. The name of a ship carries history, honor, and identity. It lives in the heavily embellished sea stories we tell each other at reunions, the patches we wear, and the pride we feel when we hear it over the radio or see it painted across our hull. That’s why the recent push to rename some Navy ships—particularly those honoring civil rights leaders and social justice pioneers—feels like more than just a shift in policy. It feels personal.
Traditionally, ship naming followed a fairly consistent logic: aircraft carriers named after presidents and statesmen, battleships (and now ballistic missile subs) after states, cruisers after battles, destroyers after naval heroes, and support ships often named for individuals of significance. The Secretary of the Navy has formal authority over naming, but the process has long drawn from established conventions and public symbolism (History.Navy.mil). That tradition began to evolve in recent years. The USNS Harvey Milk (T-AO-206), named after the slain gay rights leader and Navy veteran, was seen by many as a gesture toward inclusivity and recognition of LGBTQ+ service members. Other Military Sealift Command ships (run by civilians in support of Navy missions) followed suit, honoring figures like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Cesar Chavez, and Harriet Tubman—Americans who, though not military, shaped our moral and civic landscape (Houston Chronicle). But under a recent directive by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, this trend is reversing. As part of what some have called a DEI purge, the Pentagon is actively considering stripping these names from existing ships. The rationale? Restoring a “warrior ethos” to military culture (Politico). The announcement conveniently coincided with Pride Month, leading many to question the intent behind the timing and the policy (AP News). Let’s be clear: The argument isn’t about whether the Navy should be rooted in strength and readiness. Of course it should. But naming a ship after Harvey Milk doesn’t weaken our military. In fact, it reminds us that courage comes in many forms—and that the Navy has space for all who serve with honor. My first ship was named after a minor New England river; I am nevertheless still very proud of having served aboard her. The proposed renaming sends another message: that stories of resistance, equity, and sacrifice outside of battlefield heroism are somehow unworthy of remembrance. As someone who spent years aboard a fleet oiler and a guided-missile destroyer, I find that disheartening. Our force is stronger when we draw from the full story of America, not just the parts that fit one ideology. We’ve also seen shifts in naming traditions to reflect progress. The upcoming Ford-class carrier, CVN-81, will bear the name of Doris Miller, a Black enlisted sailor and hero of Pearl Harbor who served on the USS West Virginia (BB-48). It’s a historic and powerful gesture—one that aligns perfectly with the Navy’s values (NPR). If we now backpedal on that kind of progress, what are we saying to the next generation of sailors? Renaming a ship isn’t just a logistical hassle (though it is that—changing hull markings, documentation, and ceremonial artifacts is no small feat). In the past, it was seen by many sailors as bad luck, and was thought to bring misfortune to those who sailed on the renamed ship (Discover Boating). More than that, it erodes the morale of those who felt seen by those choices. When we honor leaders like Milk or Tubman, we aren’t making a political statement—we’re recognizing different ways Americans have served and sacrificed. Tradition matters. So does inclusion. They are not mutually exclusive. What is dangerous is turning a thoughtful naming process into a tool of partisan erasure. I believe in the strength of our Navy. I also believe that strength includes the courage to acknowledge all who have moved this country forward—on deck, on land, in protest, or in court. Sources
I’ve lived in this country for more than 40 years. I served in the military, raised my kids here, paid my taxes, and, like many of us, tried to do the right thing. I became a U.S. citizen in ’87 and still believe this country is worth fighting for.
Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about what it means to speak up when things feel off. Not just complaining, but actually doing something. The truth is, many people I know are worried about the future. Some are quiet because they’re afraid. Others are just burned out or think it won’t matter. But here’s the thing: doing nothing guarantees more of the same. And silence—however well-intentioned—has never protected anyone from what happens when democracies break down. 🧭 The Role of the Ordinary, Responsible Citizen I’m not the expert here. But I do think regular people like us have more power than we realize. Especially if we do a few basic things, like:
✊ What You Can Actually Do
🧠 Final Thought I don’t have all the answers. But I know that hoping someone else will fix it never works well. We’re all on the hook—citizens, immigrants, veterans, parents, neighbors. I didn’t serve just to watch democracy erode in silence. Speaking out, engaging, and staying informed are not radical; they are civic responsibility. 📚 Sources & Civic Engagement Here are links to the civic engagement sources I mentioned in the body of the blog. I added several more for good measure:
|
AuthorAxel Newe is a strategic partnerships and GTM leader with a background in healthcare, SaaS, and digital transformation. He’s also a Navy veteran, cyclist, and lifelong problem solver. Lately, he’s been writing not just from the field and the road—but from the gut—on democracy, civic engagement, and current events (minus the rage memes). This blog is where clarity meets commentary, one honest post at a time. ArchivesCategories
All
|
RSS Feed